{"id":1758,"date":"2011-09-22T10:00:11","date_gmt":"2011-09-22T14:00:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/meetcontent.com\/?p=1758"},"modified":"2017-04-20T00:09:11","modified_gmt":"2017-04-20T04:09:11","slug":"selling-content-strategy-a-continuous-process","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/meetcontent.com\/blog\/selling-content-strategy-a-continuous-process\/","title":{"rendered":"Selling Content Strategy: A Continuous Process"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Your
Demonstrate your game plan at every step of the content planning process to maintain stakeholder buy-in.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

One of the top questions new content strategy practitioners have \u2014 as I did when first introduced to the discipline \u2014 is how do you sell it?<\/em><\/p>\n

How do you make the case for content strategy and convince web stakeholders that their content needs a better plan (assuming a plan currently exists \u2014 eek!)?<\/p>\n

It\u2019s easy to get discouraged. Have you ever had an experience like the following?<\/p>\n

"I told my boss (or HiPPO [Highest Paid Person\u2019s Opinion]) our content is outdated and ineffective. I said, we need a message architecture, a content audit, a style guide, and a governance and measurement plan. We\u2019re running around creating content with short timelines, and we don\u2019t know if what we\u2019re doing is necessary or effective. Why don\u2019t people get it? Heck, I\u2019ve shown them Kristina Halvorson\u2019s book<\/a>!"<\/p>\n

If this is you, pull up a chair. You\u2019re in good company.<\/p>\n

One of the reasons I often focus on content measurement (evaluating content quality and success) is because I realized early on that I needed practical ways to demonstrate the value of my work. It’s not enough to tell web stakeholders that their content is useless, confusing, or off-brand. We have to demonstrate why it’s ineffective and why it’s in their<\/em> best interest to make it better. <\/p>\n

We’re Selling a Process, Not a Product<\/h2>\n
\n
Content strategy is a process, not a product.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The reason many stumble on the question of selling content strategy is because they think of it as a product or deliverable. Content strategy is a process, not a product. <\/p>\n

Content audits, content style guides, content templates, editorial calendars and publishing workflows are all deliverables that can help you make the case for content strategy. However, none of these things stand on their own: they may get you in the door, but to keep people involved and interested, you have to sell content strategy again, and again. And again.<\/p>\n

When I took on my first large-scale content strategy job, I thought once I got buy-in for the project, I could take my sales hat off and focus on my work. Boy, was I wrong. Every time I took my sales hat off, I lost stakeholder motivation. I learned quickly that I could never afford to stop selling content strategy. It wasn’t enough that stakeholders were sold on the need for a message architecture or a content audit or other deliverables \u2014 they needed to be reminded throughout the process.<\/p>\n

Truth is, making the case for content strategy is part of a content strategist\u2019s job. If you\u2019re in this role, embrace the responsibility, don\u2019t begrudge it. And, really, how bad is it to educate people about a topic you love? Right?!<\/p>\n

Think Education, Not Sales<\/h2>\n
\n
The secret to successfully selling content strategy is education.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Content professionals are often not comfortable acting as sales people. Believe me, I can relate. But the secret to successfully selling content strategy is education, not sales. Take off your sales hat and put on a teaching hat. We need to educate content stakeholders about the content strategy process throughout the project, not just at the beginning.<\/p>\n

It helps that our work makes sense. Content strategy is logical, not amorphous. There’s a reason why messaging needs to lead the content plan and why an audit needs to inform the scope of work. How can you assess content quality without understanding your communication goals? How do you know what content you need if you don’t know what content you have? <\/p>\n

Explain the logical development of the content planning process at each step along the way. Demonstrate how you got from phase 1 to phase 2 and what\u2019s needed (and why) for phase 3. It’s easier to get content strategy buy-in when people see it in action. <\/p>\n

"Oh, dear. We need a content governance plan." Right-o, Mr. HiPPO!<\/p>\n

Content Strategy As Change Management<\/h2>\n
\n
People are not averse to quality content. They’re not opposed to happy users. They’re resistant to change.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Content strategist Karen McGrane describes much of content strategy work as change management<\/a>. I love this idea because it gets to the heart of the challenge. People are not averse to quality content. They’re not opposed to happy users. They’re resistant to change. <\/p>\n

Content strategy forces people to think differently about how they approach their work on the web. It raises questions they can’t easily answer and identifies problems they can’t easily solve. Who wouldn’t want to avoid that?<\/p>\n

If we want to gain support for content strategy, we need to help stakeholders make a shift in how they approach the web. We need to show them how content strategy helps them do better work and, ultimately, do that work more efficiently.<\/p>\n

Inspire<\/h2>\n

How do you<\/em> sell \u2014 or, rather, educate \u2014 people on content strategy? What approaches have you found either successful or ineffective?<\/p>\n

Here are a few kick-start approaches, including one by me.<\/p>\n